https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334841
--- Comment #7 from [email protected] --- Spec URL: https://pagure.io/rust-libphosh-sys/raw/94440753295a75b0caecce51151b2cef02a6d032/f/rust-libphosh-sys.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8055/127498055/rust-libphosh-sys-0.0.4-3.fc42.src.rpm --- Notes: * I've added a basic [rust2rpm.toml](https://pagure.io/rust-libphosh-sys/blob/main/f/rust2rpm.toml) with the suggested content. * I didn't bother to incorporate the manually patched LICENSE Source: + script to copy that file to rust2rpm.toml, because those will be removed in libphosh 0.0.5 (which includes the LICENSE in the packaged crate on crates.io) * As noted in previous comment, I can't do the 0.0.5 bump yet because it depends on Phosh being updated to 0.44 first. * I couldn't see a way to add ExcludeArch in rust2rpm.toml. `[package.supported-arches]` seems to be a different thing, right? * While investigating the ExcludeArch thing, I came across one of [your comments last year](https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2266544#c5) indicating that a comment as to why i686 isn't necessary - so I took some initiative and removed the ExcludeArch comment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334841 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202334841%23c7 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
