https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334903
--- Comment #6 from Anthony Oon <[email protected]> --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/AnthonyZhOon/ghostty-rpm/refs/heads/main/SPECS/ghostty.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/AnthonyZhOon/ghostty-rpm/releases/download/v1.0.1/ghostty-1.0.1-1.fc41.src.rpm There's a PR merged for removing the default strip in release mode behaviour to allow debuginfo in the next upstream release https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty/pull/3945 There's some news about a next 1.1 release in a few weeks upstream. Versioned archives are available since 1.0.1 I've removed the network requirement and used zig-rpm-macros Got some comments from someone who works on the zig package at https://pagure.io/ghostty-rpm/pull-request/1 There's some precedent in river for just providing plain bundled(<dep>) = <version> for the zig dependencies as it reflects what the package manager zon names dependencies for zig, and they suggest a "bundled(zon(<dep>)) = <version>" syntax if we want to add metadata. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2334903 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202334903%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
