https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323071

Ben Beasley <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|needinfo?(code@musicinmybra |needinfo?(gui1ty@penguinpee
                   |in.net)                     |.nl)



--- Comment #7 from Ben Beasley <[email protected]> ---
From the latest submission, I don’t believe this comment is correct:

# _version.py, from the sources (SRPM) as well as the shipped (RPM)
# version are Unlicense.

As noted in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323071#c2,
versioneer.py and etelemetry/_version.py in the source archive are both based
on versioneer 0.21, which was in the CC0-1.0 era; see
https://github.com/python-versioneer/python-versioneer/commit/dc5cddf5cf3d6ae5048bf1c28df2982ecb20fe4c
and
https://github.com/python-versioneer/python-versioneer/tree/0.21?tab=readme-ov-file#license.

Since you generate _version.py for the binary RPMs using the system versioneer,
the License "Apache-2.0 AND Unlicense" is correct, but if you had a
SourceLicense, it would need to be "Apache-2.0 AND CC0-1.0".


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2323071

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202323071%23c7

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to