https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314358

Zbigniew JÄ™drzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]



--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew JÄ™drzejewski-Szmek <[email protected]> ---
Please don't use the confusingly-named %bconf_with/without.

> # always bootstrap: otherwise rebuild fails
> %bcond_without boot
%bcond bootstrap 1

> %bcond_without docs
%bcond docs 1

> # requires network?
> %bcond_with test
%bcond test 0

> # no chez-scheme for s390x
> # ppc64le and i686 give linking error:
> # - Exception: (while loading libc.so) /lib/libc.so: invalid ELF header
> %ifarch ppc64le s390x %{ix86}
> %bcond_without racket
> %else
> %bcond_with racket
> %endif
Hmm. Is the with/without reversed?
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/3165
is still unresolved. So I guess something like this is the best we
can do right now:

%ifarch ppc64le s390x %{ix86}
%bcond racket 0
%else
%bcond racket 1
%endif


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314358

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202314358%23c2

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to