https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2327650
--- Comment #23 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- > > 2. The License tag is more complicated than it needs to be. > > It's not *wrong*, but you could shorten it by applying commutativity and > > associativity for the AND and OR operators, and dropping duplicate clauses. > > I think it's done now. Now you simplified too much :D This is what I would end up with as the simplest possible License tag: """ License: MPL-2.0 AND Apache-2.0 AND BSD-3-Clause AND MIT AND Unicode-DFS-2016 AND (0BSD OR MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND (Apache-2.0 OR BSL-1.0) AND (Apache-2.0 OR ISC OR MIT) AND (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND (Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND (BSD-2-Clause OR Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND (MIT OR Apache-2.0 OR Zlib) AND (Unlicense OR MIT) """ (deduplicated and sorted alphabetically, except for MPL-2.0, which is the license for aw-server-rust itself) Other than that, looks good to me now, thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2327650 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202327650%23c23 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
