https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338412
--- Comment #18 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Simone Caronni from comment #17) > (In reply to Fedora Review Service from comment #16) > > Found issues: > > > > - Not a valid SPDX expression 'Apache-2.0 and BSD-2-clause and BSD-3-clause > > and Khronos and MIT and Unlicense and MIT~whatever and libtiff and Zlib'. > > Read more: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1 > > I'm at a loss with the license field, anyone has any pointer? Yes. Each identifier must be present on Fedora allowed list (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/). Let's check: Apache-2.0: present BSD-2-clause: present, but I guess you want BSD-2-Clause (note the capital C) BSD-3-clause: as above Khronos: not present MIT: present Unlicense: present MIT~whatever: not present libtiff: present Zlib: present So, you have two identifiers not listed among Fedora allowed licenses, meaning the expression is invalid. I think you need to check which files come up as having Khronos and mit_whatever license in licensecheck and investigating what they actually are. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2338412 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202338412%23c18 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
