https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346531

Carl George 🤠 <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]



--- Comment #12 from Carl George 🤠 <[email protected]> ---
I share Neal's concerns.  The -epel suffix is reserved for packages that
provide missing RHEL/CentOS subpackages.

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-policy-missing-sub-packages/

This source package is creating binary packages that seem to duplicate packages
that are shipped in RHEL/CentOS.

* selinux-policy-epel-devel
* selinux-policy-epel-mls
* selinux-policy-epel-targeted

It also seems the selinux-policy-epel-devel package is doing a weird thing to
avoid file conflicts with selinux-policy-devel by moving files into
/usr/share/selinux/devel/include/include/ (note the double include directory).


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346531

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202346531%23c12

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to