https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344240
--- Comment #10 from Fabio Valentini <[email protected]> --- > Fabio: I've updated the License field to `LGPL-2.1-or-later AND MIT`. I > assume this is what you were hinting at in your comment on the upstream issue. Yes, that's exactly what I meant, thanks! I'm not sure if it's sufficient to have the updated License tag though, or if the package would also need to include the LGPL-2.1-or-later license text. I don't deal with GPL-ish licenses often enough to know whether that's a hard requirement here or not - I'll ask for a second opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344240 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202344240%23c10 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
