https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2357266
--- Comment #11 from Bryn M. Reeves <[email protected]> --- > This is not a distributable combination. Is is possible to fix the GPL code > to be "GPL-2.0-or-later" instead? That contradicts the advice we received during legal review. The Fedora license-validate tool also considers this a valid combination: $ license-validate -v 'GPL-2.0-only AND Apache-2.0' Approved license (this just seems to be checking that A OR B is valid) There are existing packages with this license combination, for e.g. golang-github-iovisor-gobpf-devel: Name : golang-github-iovisor-gobpf-devel Epoch : 0 Version : 0.2.0 Release : 5.fc41 Architecture : noarch Download size : 123.8 KiB Installed size : 400.8 KiB Source : golang-github-iovisor-gobpf-0.2.0-5.fc41.src.rpm Repository : fedora Summary : Go bindings for creating BPF programs URL : https://github.com/iovisor/gobpf License : GPL-2.0-only AND Apache-2.0 Description : Go bindings for creating BPF programs. I'm not in principal opposed to re-licensing as GPL-2.0-or-later, and I am in a position to do that for the covered code, but I don't think it is necessary based on the advice we've received about this so far. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2357266 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202357266%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
