https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2373136
--- Comment #7 from Jocelyn Falempe <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #1) > > > %package -n %{lname} > > We don't typically do this in Fedora, this can be folded back into the main > "libtsm" package. I'm sorry, I'm not sure what to do there. Should I just remove the lines with %{lname} ? I've started a MR with the other requested changes: https://gitlab.com/kdj0c/copr-fedora/-/merge_requests/1/diffs Thanks for fixing the bug title. (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #4) > Hmm okay. It's weird because the openSUSE spec looks very similar: > https://build.opensuse.org/projects/X11:terminals/packages/libtsm/files/ > libtsm.spec?expand=1 Hum, it looks like he has done some copy/paste from Suse when updating to use Aetf's repo. I can copy the changelogs from here (except the 2025 entry). https://build.opensuse.org/projects/X11:terminals/packages/libtsm/files/libtsm.changes?expand=1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2373136 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202373136%23c7 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
