https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2377151
--- Comment #6 from Marc-Andre Lureau <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #5) > > Why is it mandatory to have unversionned package name? > > Because ... it's a rule? It's not a strict rule: "One package SHOULD use the base name" > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple > > > This would avoid the burden to update all the up to date dependents > > packages every time upstream bump... > > The same is achieved by the current approach though? How so? If "rust-foo" depends on "rust-rstest" == 0.25 and we bump "rust-rstest", then "rust-foo" is broken. Thus we need to update all reverse-deps to use the branched version whenever a new version of rstest is released. Or am I missing something? > I don't understand the problem you're trying to solve here. Not having to update all the reverse deps whenever a package bump its major version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2377151 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202377151%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
