https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379742

wojnilowicz <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from wojnilowicz <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Ben Beasley from comment #5)
> (In reply to wojnilowicz from comment #4)
> > No problem. I cannot approve it though due to an issue with gpg. Details
> > below. Could you clarify?
> > 
> > 
> > [!]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
> >      publishes signatures.
> >      Note: gpgverify is not used.
> > 
> > You missed to verify the signature? Upstream uses gpg.
> 
> As far as I can tell, upstream just signs commits, e.g.
> https://github.com/fastapilabs/fastapi-cloud-cli/commit/
> b963a0767f403e8b7c03ab1fad03a224b59c7bd3 for the 0.1.5 release.

You're right, and they don't publish signatures. The package is APPROVED then.
Sorry for the delay.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2379742

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202379742%23c6

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to