https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2376217
--- Comment #86 from Eric Eisenhart <[email protected]> --- How the heck did the openbao-vault-compat package get allowed to be pushed into EPEL with `Provides: vault` and `Obsoletes: vault`? There was never a "vault" package in Fedora or EPEL, no guarantees that openbao 2.4.1 is adequately compatible with vault 1.20, etc. This is basically a recipe for updates to break an important clustered service. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2376217 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202376217%23c86 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
