https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2397825
--- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway <[email protected]> --- I will move the extraction for these smaller packages, but there is a significant buildtime cost (and added spec complexity) to copying the tex components twice (once in %build, again in %install) when building the larger collection packages, and I do not think it is worth changing them there. To your point on the docs... in the past, there were -doc subpackages for most of the texlive component packages and it scaled poorly. rpm has mechanisms to install without files marked as %doc and that is a far better solution for most texlive components (and it makes the packaging so much cleaner). Only in egregious cases where the docs are massive (texlive-context-doc) do I force a -doc subpackage. New SPEC: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-eq-save.spec New SRPM: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/tl2025/texlive-eq-save-svn299-2.fc44.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2397825 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202397825%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
