https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2360949
--- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen <[email protected]> --- Thank you very much for reviewing the package. (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #11) > As it is a renaming, maybe good to add an obsolets and/or provides section > referencing the older pandoc package. Well the binary package names are unchanged, this is really just a renaming of the source package. Arguably perhaps the pandoc-common subpackage could be renamed to ghc-pandoc-common, though I am not sure it is really necessary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2360949 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202360949%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
