https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388645
--- Comment #11 from Neal Gompa <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #10) > (In reply to Tomi Lähteenmäki from comment #6) > > (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #5) > > > > Conflicts: squeekboard > > > > > > Why does it conflict? > > > > I don't remember why I have it there. Maybe I left it by accident as it is > > the `stevia-phosh-osk-provider` and `squeekboard-phosh-osk-provider` that > > conflict as both provides the > > `%{_datadir}/applications/sm.puri.OSK0.desktop` (see > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/squeekboard/blob/ > > c5e0624a4cea99273a0eb12425fc40b9e1c9d423/f/squeekboard.spec#_138). > > > > From user perspective it probably would be good if I add `Conflicts: > > squeekboard-phosh-osk-provider` to `stevia-phosh-osk-provider` as that > > provides "better" error if user tries to install both? > > Yeah, that makes sense. > On second thought, you might want a virtual provides: "phosh-osk-provider" and have both packages provides+conflicts so only one can be installed. Especially if that's your goal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2388645 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202388645%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
