https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2404364
--- Comment #5 from Benson Muite <[email protected]> --- > > > a( Can you add a comment about these lines: > > Provides: openarm_can = %{version} > Obsoletes: openarm_can <= 1.1.0 > Needed to ensure if someone uses old package name, it can be found. See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages > b) Also fix alignment with lines above. > Ok > c) Should -utils have: > > Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} > > or is auto generated .so deps good enough? > These are scripts. They do not need the .so files. > d) the 1.1.0 release is just 10 days, still a newer git hash is required, > why? This allows obsoleting of the previous package, a better installation process for the utility scripts and to test packit for the automatic upgrade process. spec: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/openarm-can.spec srpm: https://fed500.fedorapeople.org/openarm-can-1.1.0%5e20251016git010ea25-1.fc42.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2404364 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202404364%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
