https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2417806
Andreas Haupt <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|AutomationTriaged | --- Comment #3 from Andreas Haupt <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Terje Rosten from comment #2) > > %{bindir}/lesspipe.sh > > This will cause conflict, as file are shipped in less package already: > > $ rpm -qf /usr/bin/lesspipe.sh > less-590-6.el9.x86_64 > > and a package in EPEL9 can't conflict nor replace files in the base > distribution. No, it won't conflict as bindir is defined as: %define bindir %{_prefix}/libexec/%{name} I can rename the macro if this is confusing or breaks other assumptions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2417806 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202417806%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
