https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2412719
Terje Rosten <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Flags| |fedora-review+ CC| |[email protected] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Terje Rosten <[email protected]> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 5846 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Perl: [x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires. [x]: CPAN urls should be non-versioned. ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [!]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: perl-Log-Report-Lexicon-1.14-1.fc44.noarch.rpm perl-Log-Report-Lexicon-tests-1.14-1.fc44.noarch.rpm perl-Log-Report-Lexicon-1.14-1.fc44.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp86tdy0kg')] checks: 32, packages: 3 perl-Log-Report-Lexicon-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation perl-Log-Report-Lexicon-tests.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/libexec/perl-Log-Report-Lexicon/t/simplecal/ar_SA.mo Seems to be test file, hence harmless 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 11 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.4 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.8.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 2 perl-Log-Report-Lexicon-tests.noarch: W: no-documentation perl-Log-Report-Lexicon-tests.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/libexec/perl-Log-Report-Lexicon/t/simplecal/ar_SA.mo 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings, 7 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s Source checksums ---------------- http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MA/MARKOV/Log-Report-Lexicon-1.14.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : cb8521bd925f4ca9cf4b35d46bfc8cb9c9abff97800204e216f29a7ff9f31e58 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : cb8521bd925f4ca9cf4b35d46bfc8cb9c9abff97800204e216f29a7ff9f31e58 Requires -------- perl-Log-Report-Lexicon (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/perl perl(Encode) perl(Fcntl) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Spec) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(List::Util) perl(Locale::gettext) perl(Log::Report) perl(Log::Report::Extract) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon::Index) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon::PO) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon::POT) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon::POTcompact) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon::Table) perl(Log::Report::Translator) perl(Log::Report::Util) perl(POSIX) perl(PPI) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) perl-libs perl-Log-Report-Lexicon-tests (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/perl /usr/bin/sh glibc-langpack-tr perl(Cwd) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Encode) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(File::Temp) perl(Log::Report) perl(Log::Report::Extract::Template) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon::POT) perl(Log::Report::Translator) perl(Log::Report::Translator::Context) perl(POSIX) perl(Test::More) perl(constant) perl(lib) perl(strict) perl(utf8) perl(warnings) perl-Log-Report-Lexicon perl-Test-Harness Provides -------- perl-Log-Report-Lexicon: perl(Log::Report::Extract) perl(Log::Report::Extract::PerlPPI) perl(Log::Report::Extract::Template) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon::Index) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon::MOTcompact) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon::PO) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon::POT) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon::POTcompact) perl(Log::Report::Lexicon::Table) perl(Log::Report::Translator::Context) perl(Log::Report::Translator::Gettext) perl(Log::Report::Translator::POT) perl-Log-Report-Lexicon perl-Log-Report-Lexicon-tests: perl-Log-Report-Lexicon-tests Summary: --------- - version 1.15 is available, please update on import package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2412719 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202412719%23c2 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
