https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2378972
--- Comment #11 from Fabio Alessandro Locati <[email protected]> --- Spec URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/airspyhf.spec SRPM URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/airspyhf-1.6.8%5e20260107git30e0422-1.fc43.src.rpm Thanks! I think the only uncovered point is "Would have expected both to be either so.0* or so.1*". I could agree on that, but upstream opted for this approach, and making a deliberate change on it might be not the best approach, imho -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2378972 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202378972%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
