https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2417806
Cristian Le <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #12 from Cristian Le <[email protected]> --- Hi Andreas, thank you for introduction mail pointing us to this review. This packaging approach might not be the correct approach for this. You can avoid the conflict with the libexec, but it brings a bad user experience having to manually overwrite which lesspipe to be used. Could you open up another mail thread on [email protected] to discuss the details of this plan, how to do it in Fedora and how to do it in Epel, if you can make an epel-only package that deprecates the previous one, etc. You can CC [email protected] as the Epel expert to comment on what can be done and [email protected] to figure out if lesspipe could be split out from this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2417806 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202417806%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
