https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2445872
Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jerry James from comment #4) > Thank you for the review! The code with non-MIT licenses lives in the bench > and fuzzing directories. We do not run any benchmarks, nor do we do any > fuzzing, while building, so these files do not participate in the build at > all. I have added a comment to the spec file clarifying the situation, and > added a SourceLicense tag so these other licenses can be enumerated. Is > that sufficient? Yes, this is fine for me! I don;t see any other issues so this pavckage is ================ === APPROVED === ================ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2445872 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202445872%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
