https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314288
--- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Benson Muite from comment #3) > f) Is it possible to get clarification from the main developer on licensing? > While GPL2-or-later is used for the man page, it is unclear if the code is > also GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-2-Clause, just BSD-2-Clause or something else. Aren't the two last lines of https://github.com/jrlevine/grepcidr3/blob/main/LICENSE already good enough? > Portions of the files grepcidr.c and grepcidr.1 copyright (C) 2004, 2005 Jem > E. Berkes <[email protected]> and may be subject to a GNU public license > described in the file COPYING. For me this translates to "BSD-2-Clause AND GPL-2.0-or-later" (because "grepcidr" by Jem E. Berkes is GPL-2.0-or-later). Or am I overlooking something? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2314288 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202314288%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
