https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2493789
--- Comment #4 from blinxen <[email protected]> --- > Can you explain this ? > bazelisk.spec:34: E: buildarch-instead-of-exclusivearch-tag x86_64 aarch64 Maybe I misunderstood those directives but the compilation fails on anything that is not x86 or aarch64. Maybe it just needs BuildArch then. > Make sure of your specfile in the srpm. The Spec URL: bazelisk.spec what I > reviewed, it is fine. The diff just shows rpmautospec changes which are done when building the src.rpm with "fedpkd srpm". False alarm I would say. > I was expecting /usr/bin/bazel when I was trying out the package, maybe add a > symlink to /usr/bin/bazelisk I was unsure if it should be bazelisk or bazel because if in the future someone packages bazel then it would conflict with this package. For this reason, I would like to keep it as bazelisk and people can just use an alias if they want it as bazel I have removed the ExclusiveArch since that is not needed. Links to the uploaded files: SRPM URL: https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/bazelisk/bazelisk-1.29.0-1.fc45.src.rpm Spec URL: https://blinxen.fedorapeople.org/bazelisk/bazelisk.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2493789 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202493789%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
