https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2488341
Carl George 🤠<[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Carl George 🤠<[email protected]> --- What's the strategy here in regards to the Fedora package? Normally the latest version will be packaged there first. This compat package is a newer version than what is currently in rawhide. Compat packages are usually needed when there is a need for a different version than the existing default. slurm isn't yet in EPEL 10, so it may be a better approach to update the rawhide spec file to version 26.05, and then fast-forward the epel10 branch to that commit. Once there is a default slurm package in EPEL 10, then future versions would make sense as versioned compat packages. If the intent is to move to a future where there are only versioned slurm packages, that change should happen in Fedora first before being brought to EPEL. Some examples: python-django5 / python-django6, python3.14 / python3.15 Technically compat packages qualify for a review exception, but there's no harm in doing a review anyways to verify the parallel or conflicting aspects. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/#_package_review_exceptions What library soname version will this be? This is obscured in the spec file by an overly greedy glob, which is probably the first thing that needs to be fixed. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_listing_shared_library_files The rawhide package has these: libpmi.so.0 libpmi2.so.0 libslurm.so.44 libslurm_pmi-25.11.4.so libslurmfull-25.11.4.so If those are all different in the compat package, ideally the libs subpackage could be set up as a parallel package and not a conflicting one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2488341 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202488341%23c1 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
