https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419
Jens Petersen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <[email protected]> --- libreoffice-dict-an.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Aragonese', 'Summary(en_US) Aragonese -> Aragon') libreoffice-dict-an.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Aragonese', '%description -l en_US Aragonese -> Aragon') libreoffice-dict-bo.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Tibetian', 'Summary(en_US) Tibetian -> Tibetan, Titian') libreoffice-dict-bo.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Tibetian', '%description -l en_US Tibetian -> Tibetan, Titian') This ^^ is a typo libreoffice-dict-es-CR.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Costa', 'Summary(en_US) Costa -> Hosta, Coats, Costs') libreoffice-dict-es-CR.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Costa', '%description -l en_US Costa -> Hosta, Coats, Costs') This ^ should be Costa Rica? Though I am not convinced we should split all the Spanish dictionaries: it seems upstream doesn't? libreoffice-dict-gl.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Galician', 'Summary(en_US) Galician -> Clinician, Galvanic, Alicia') libreoffice-dict-gl.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Galician', '%description -l en_US Galician -> Clinician, Galvanic, Alicia') libreoffice-dict-oc.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Occitan', 'Summary(en_US) Occitan -> Occidental') libreoffice-dict-oc.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Occitan', '%description -l en_US Occitan -> Occidental') libreoffice-dict-or.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Odia', 'Summary(en_US) Odia -> Odis, Odin, Zodiac') libreoffice-dict-or.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Odia', '%description -l en_US Odia -> Odis, Odin, Zodiac') libreoffice-dict-si.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Sinhala', 'Summary(en_US) Sinhala -> Sinhalese') libreoffice-dict-si.noarch: E: spelling-error ('Sinhala', '%description -l en_US Sinhala -> Sinhalese') libreoffice-dictionaries.src: E: spelling-error ('hunspell', 'Summary(en_US) hunspell -> Hunspell, unshapely') libreoffice-dictionaries.src: E: spelling-error ('hunspell', '%description -l en_US hunspell -> Hunspell, unshapely') libreoffice-dictionaries.spec: W: no-%check-section libreoffice-dictionaries.spec: W: no-%check-section libreoffice-dictionaries.spec: W: no-%check-section libreoffice-dict-bg.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-bg/COPYING libreoffice-dict-bn_BD.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-bn_BD/COPYING libreoffice-dict-eo.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/hunspell/eo.aff libreoffice-dict-gd.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/hunspell/gd_GB.aff libreoffice-dict-hi.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-hi/COPYING libreoffice-dict-hi.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-hi/Copyright libreoffice-dict-kn.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dict-kn/README-kn_IN.txt libreoffice-dict-lv.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dict-lv/README_lv_LV.txt libreoffice-dict-mr.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-mr/COPYING libreoffice-dict-oc.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-oc/LICENCES-fr.txt libreoffice-dict-pl.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dict-pl/README_pl.txt libreoffice-dict-ro.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-ro/COPYING.GPL libreoffice-dict-ro.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-ro/COPYING.LGPL libreoffice-dict-sk.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/libreoffice-dict-sk/LICENSE.txt libreoffice-dict-te.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/libreoffice-dict-te/README_te_IN.txt 94 packages and 2 specfiles checked; 31 errors, 3 warnings, 351 filtered, 31 badness; has taken 15.4 s > Spec license: GPL-2.0-or-later OR LGPL-2.1-or-later OR MPL-1.1 Not sure if this is sufficient, though there is no binary base package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2496419 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202496419%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
