https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2497525

Jitka Plesnikova <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
           Assignee|[email protected]    |[email protected]



--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova <[email protected]> ---
Source file is ok
Summary is ok
License is ok
Description is ok
URL and Source0 are ok
All tests passed

BuildRequires are ok
FIX: Add build-require 'coreutils' - it is needed for %{_fixperms}
TODO: Please add version restriction for perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) >= 6.76
      NO_PACKLIST is provided since this version.

$ rpm -qp --requires perl-Proc-Wait3-0.05-37.fc45.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c |
grep -v rpmlib
      1 libc.so.6()(64bit)
      1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
      1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
      1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_ABI_DT_RELR)(64bit)
      1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_ABI_GNU2_TLS)(64bit)
      1 libperl.so.5.42()(64bit)
      1 perl(DynaLoader)
      1 perl(Exporter)
      1 perl-libs
      1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.42.2)
      1 perl(strict)
      1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.6.0
      1 perl(warnings)
      1 rtld(GNU_HASH)
Binary requires are Ok.

$ rpm -qp --provides perl-Proc-Wait3-0.05-37.fc45.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c
      1 perl(Proc::Wait3) = 0.05
      1 perl-Proc-Wait3 = 0.05-37.fc45
      1 perl-Proc-Wait3(x86-64) = 0.05-37.fc45
Binary provides are Ok.

$ rpmlint ./perl-Proc-Wait3*
perl-Proc-Wait3.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/perl-Proc-Wait3/LICENSE
 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings, 8 filtered, 1
badness; has taken 0.4 s
TODO: The incorrect FSF address is in the upstream LICENSE file, it should
      be report to upstream

TODO: Explicitly name packaged files in %{_mandir}/man* and %{perl_vendorarch}
directories
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_explicit_lists.

Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guide lines.
Please correct 'FIX' item and consider fixing 'TODO' items.

Resolution:
Approved


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2497525

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202497525%23c2

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to