https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2493314
Cristian Le <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #32 from Cristian Le <[email protected]> --- > I cannot ensure the patch url is directly appliable in the libxs-1.0.0 > tarball, as there's other modification upstream and I wish to keep the > patches minimal here. Can I add a description at the top of the patch with > what it does and that it has been applied upstream? That is perfectly fine and expected. You just put the url of where you initially got it as a comment above it. A description of what it does or why it was added should be added in either case You can leave out `%license LICENSE.md` in the docs subpackage now that it is handled by the requires. Just patch comments and the question if `%{_isa}` in the docs are remaining, but those are not major and can be tweaked on import. PACKAGE APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2493314 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202493314%23c32 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
