https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2510919
Cristian Le <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] --- Comment #5 from Cristian Le <[email protected]> --- Next time please indicate that this is an unretirement in the description (although if we are lucky we will have a whole new process for the next time :) ). I like the > Provides: %{name}-mpi-devel = %{version}-%{release} idea, but we might want to do something different with the mpi-5 ABI idea that is floating around. We can work on a change proposal together for that if you feel up for it? For now, let's just keep it the same like the other mpi packages. Please do the `%conf` split here. It is especially useful for mpi packages The prep steps look super sus. You should be able to do the `%configure` and `%make_build` in specific subdirectories similar to the cmake ones. Can you check if using `autoreconf` is possible for this package? Will need to do another license check, I really doubt that license tag is complete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2510919 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202510919%23c5 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
