https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2511720

Michael Cronenworth <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from Michael Cronenworth <[email protected]> ---
Looks great. Good job!

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
  in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
  for the package is included in %license.
  Note: License file LICENSE-MIT is not marked as %license
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/LicensingGuidelines/#_license_text


===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "*No copyright* MIT
     License". 753 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/michael/Projects/fedora/review/markdownlint-
     cli2/2511720-markdownlint-cli2/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries or specifies bundled libraries
     with Provides: bundled(<libname>) if unbundling is not possible.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 35633 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
     Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
     attached diff).
     See: (this test has no URL)
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: markdownlint-cli2-0.23.2-1.fc46.noarch.rpm
          markdownlint-cli2-0.23.2-1.fc46.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.8.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpoacz1jee')]
checks: 32, packages: 2

markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary markdownlint-cli2
markdownlint-cli2.spec: W: invalid-url Source1:
markdownlint-cli2-0.23.2-nm-prod.tgz
markdownlint-cli2.spec: W: invalid-url Source2:
markdownlint-cli2-0.23.2-nm-dev.tgz
markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/node_modules/markdownlint-cli2/node_modules/.bin
markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/node_modules/markdownlint-cli2/node_modules/.bin
markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/node_modules/markdownlint-cli2/node_modules/.package-lock.json
markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/node_modules/markdownlint-cli2/node_modules/markdownlint/schema/.markdownlint.jsonc
markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/node_modules/markdownlint-cli2/node_modules/markdownlint/schema/.markdownlint.yaml
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings, 489 filtered, 0
badness; has taken 1.0 s 




Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.10.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.15/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 33, packages: 1

markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary markdownlint-cli2
markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/node_modules/markdownlint-cli2/node_modules/.bin
markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/node_modules/markdownlint-cli2/node_modules/.bin
markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/node_modules/markdownlint-cli2/node_modules/.package-lock.json
markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/node_modules/markdownlint-cli2/node_modules/markdownlint/schema/.markdownlint.jsonc
markdownlint-cli2.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/lib/node_modules/markdownlint-cli2/node_modules/markdownlint/schema/.markdownlint.yaml
 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings, 485 filtered, 0
badness; has taken 0.4 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/DavidAnson/markdownlint-cli2/archive/v0.23.2/markdownlint-cli2-0.23.2.tar.gz
:
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
73cc7467df55e8ad6b16cc038b1aece21e99ebd59b1eed79c3274bb68af713dc
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
73cc7467df55e8ad6b16cc038b1aece21e99ebd59b1eed79c3274bb68af713dc


Requires
--------
markdownlint-cli2 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/node
    nodejs(engine)



Provides
--------
markdownlint-cli2:
    bundled(nodejs-@nodelib/fs.scandir)
    bundled(nodejs-@nodelib/fs.stat)
    bundled(nodejs-@nodelib/fs.walk)
    bundled(nodejs-@sindresorhus/merge-streams)
    bundled(nodejs-@types/debug)
    bundled(nodejs-@types/katex)
    bundled(nodejs-@types/ms)
    bundled(nodejs-@types/unist)
    bundled(nodejs-ansi-regex)
    bundled(nodejs-argparse)
    bundled(nodejs-braces)
    bundled(nodejs-character-entities)
    bundled(nodejs-character-entities-legacy)
    bundled(nodejs-character-reference-invalid)
    bundled(nodejs-commander)
    bundled(nodejs-debug)
    bundled(nodejs-decode-named-character-reference)
    bundled(nodejs-dequal)
    bundled(nodejs-devlop)
    bundled(nodejs-entities)
    bundled(nodejs-fast-glob)
    bundled(nodejs-fastq)
    bundled(nodejs-fill-range)
    bundled(nodejs-get-east-asian-width)
    bundled(nodejs-glob-parent)
    bundled(nodejs-globby)
    bundled(nodejs-ignore)
    bundled(nodejs-is-alphabetical)
    bundled(nodejs-is-alphanumerical)
    bundled(nodejs-is-decimal)
    bundled(nodejs-is-extglob)
    bundled(nodejs-is-glob)
    bundled(nodejs-is-hexadecimal)
    bundled(nodejs-is-number)
    bundled(nodejs-is-path-inside)
    bundled(nodejs-js-yaml)
    bundled(nodejs-jsonc-parser)
    bundled(nodejs-jsonpointer)
    bundled(nodejs-katex)
    bundled(nodejs-linkify-it)
    bundled(nodejs-markdown-it)
    bundled(nodejs-markdownlint)
    bundled(nodejs-markdownlint-cli2-formatter-default)
    bundled(nodejs-mdurl)
    bundled(nodejs-merge2)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-core-commonmark)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-extension-directive)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-extension-gfm-autolink-literal)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-extension-gfm-footnote)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-extension-gfm-table)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-extension-math)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-factory-destination)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-factory-label)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-factory-space)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-factory-title)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-factory-whitespace)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-character)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-chunked)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-classify-character)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-combine-extensions)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-decode-numeric-character-reference)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-encode)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-html-tag-name)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-normalize-identifier)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-resolve-all)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-sanitize-uri)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-subtokenize)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-symbol)
    bundled(nodejs-micromark-util-types)
    bundled(nodejs-micromatch)
    bundled(nodejs-ms)
    bundled(nodejs-parse-entities)
    bundled(nodejs-picomatch)
    bundled(nodejs-punycode.js)
    bundled(nodejs-queue-microtask)
    bundled(nodejs-reusify)
    bundled(nodejs-run-parallel)
    bundled(nodejs-slash)
    bundled(nodejs-smol-toml)
    bundled(nodejs-string-width)
    bundled(nodejs-strip-ansi)
    bundled(nodejs-to-regex-range)
    bundled(nodejs-uc.micro)
    bundled(nodejs-unicorn-magic)
    markdownlint-cli2
    npm(markdownlint-cli2)



Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
---------------------------------
---
/home/michael/Projects/fedora/review/markdownlint-cli2/2511720-markdownlint-cli2/srpm/markdownlint-cli2.spec
       2026-08-23 20:55:23.447251489 -0500
+++
/home/michael/Projects/fedora/review/markdownlint-cli2/2511720-markdownlint-cli2/srpm-unpacked/markdownlint-cli2.spec
      2026-08-19 19:00:00.000000000 -0500
@@ -1,2 +1,12 @@
+## START: Set by rpmautospec
+## (rpmautospec version 0.8.4)
+## RPMAUTOSPEC: autorelease, autochangelog
+%define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua:
+    release_number = 1;
+    base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}"));
+    print(release_number + base_release_number - 1);
+}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}}
+## END: Set by rpmautospec
+
 %global npm_name markdownlint-cli2

@@ -99,3 +109,6 @@

 %changelog
-%autochangelog
+## START: Generated by rpmautospec
+* Thu Aug 20 2026 John Doe <[email protected]> - 0.23.2-1
+- Uncommitted changes
+## END: Generated by rpmautospec


Generated by fedora-review 0.11.0 (05c5b26) last change: 2025-11-29
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2511720
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic
Disabled plugins: C/C++, Haskell, SugarActivity, Perl, Ocaml, PHP, Java,
Python, fonts, R
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2511720

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202511720%23c8

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to