https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517899



--- Comment #2 from Jerry James <[email protected]> ---
Thank you for the review!

(In reply to Terje Rosten from comment #1)
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. 
>      License seems gp GPLv2 only to me.

In the gap world, package metadata resides in PackageInfo.g.  If you look in
this package's PackageInfo.g, line 12 is:

License := "GPL-2.0-or-later",

> [!]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
>      Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
>      Please tell how source1 was generated

I have added a comment explaining this.

> [!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
>      Possible to add a sanity check of some sort?

There actually is a %check section already, and it runs some tests.  It's
partially hidden behind the gap buildsystem macros, though, which may make it
hard to notice.  Take a look at the build log.  You should see %check in the
output, and after the GAP banner some text that starts like this:
```
testing: ~/build/BUILD/gap-pkg-perfgrp-1.0.0-build/BUILDROOT/usr/share/gap/pkg\
/perfgrp/tst/PerfectGroups.tst
    1783 ms (360 ms GC) and 456MB allocated for PerfectGroups.tst
```

and ending like this:
```
-----------------------------------
total     38358 ms (1480 ms GC) and 2.42GB allocated
              0 failures in 4 files

#I  No errors detected while testing
```

> gap-pkg-perfgrp.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
> /usr/share/licenses/gap-pkg-perfgrp/LICENSE
> 
> > Please ping upstream about this issue.

I have done so: https://github.com/gap-packages/perfgrp/issues/2

The URLs are the same as before:
Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-perfgrp/gap-pkg-perfgrp.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-perfgrp/gap-pkg-perfgrp-1.0.0-1.fc46.src.rpm


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517899

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202517899%23c2

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new

Reply via email to