https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2441999
--- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Phoebe Harris from comment #2) > The only change I would request here is the license issue - the rest look > good to me with the caveats that my knowledge here is quite limited. > > Note that the license in the specfile contradicts the license upstream. The > specfile claims that it's licensed under a combination of permissive > licenses, while upstream is purely Apache-2.0. Please note that this sztp-client packaging bundles/vendors some dependent libraries in accordance with current Fedora Packaging guidelines, see also: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/#_vendored_dependencies Bundling/vendoring dependent libraries leads to more licenses here instead of just the one of sztp-client itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2441999 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202441999%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://forge.fedoraproject.org/infra/tickets/issues/new
