Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699205

Mario Blättermann <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann <[email protected]> 2011-05-08 09:05:29 
EDT ---
I've repeated the builds successfully for f14 and f15 to see if it builds
there:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3058077
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3058081

$ rpmlint -v *
perl-Graph-Easy.noarch: I: checking
perl-Graph-Easy.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US layouter -> lay
outer, lay-outer, layout er
perl-Graph-Easy.noarch: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/Graph-Easy/
(timeout 10 seconds)
perl-Graph-Easy.src: I: checking
perl-Graph-Easy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US layouter -> lay
outer, lay-outer, layout er
perl-Graph-Easy.src: I: checking-url http://search.cpan.org/dist/Graph-Easy/
(timeout 10 seconds)
perl-Graph-Easy.src: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SH/SHLOMIF/Graph-Easy-0.70.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
perl-Graph-Easy.spec: I: checking-url
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/S/SH/SHLOMIF/Graph-Easy-0.70.tar.gz (timeout 10
seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

Just a spelling error. But in my mind, "layouter" is a common spelling, too.
Could be kept as is.

I'm not sure at all if "examples" in %doc should be followed by a / to let the
package own the whole folder including its contents.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to