Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=642208 Kalev Lember <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[email protected] |[email protected] Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember <[email protected]> 2011-05-11 02:52:29 EDT --- No feedback to the mail, so I guess lets give it a try. I'm approving the package based on Amorilia's review. Thanks Amorilia! Erik, if you want to simplify some things in the spec file, then the BuildRoot tag, the 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' at the beginning of %install, the whole %clean section, and the default %defattrs are no longer needed with current Fedora releases. Also, the Obsoletes and Provides currently have %dist macro in them; it's more common to leave that out, since the 'mingw32-iconv < 1.12-14' comparison would already match the current 'mingw32-iconv-1.12-13.fc15' package: Obsoletes: mingw32-iconv < 1.12-14 Provides: mingw32-iconv = 1.12-14 But these are all things one would do during the normal maintenance of a package and not blocking the review. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
