Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693363 --- Comment #7 from David Nalley <[email protected]> 2011-05-21 19:36:46 EDT --- So long story short Petr, Silas Sewell and I have exchanged a few emails, and I think from both Silas and I our POV is: * hacking openstack-swift or st to have a different binary results in documentation not working, and fedora specific 'problems' * st and openstack-swift are not very likely to both want to be on a single system at once. So I think the conflicts idea works at least from the openstack-swift perspective. My current plan wrt openstack-swift is to introduce this conflicts with openstack-swift 1.3.0, which may be a bit, there are some additional as-of-yet-unpackaged dependencies that need to be introduced to Fedora, so it won't be immediate, but certainly soon, though adding the conflicts to st should resolve the immediate issue I believe. Thoughts, comments?? flames?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
