Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700199 --- Comment #28 from Ole <[email protected]> 2011-05-24 16:38:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > (In reply to comment #22) > > The main tomcat package %files section has these lines: > > %{bindir}/tomcat-juli.jar > > %{libdir}/tomcat-juli.jar > > > > Is it right that the jar is in two places? Also the same jar is excluded > > from > > the lib package. Will RPM automatically do this, since the jar is included > > in > > the main package? It seems like it should, otherwise some of the servlet > > spec > > jars, etc. would also be included in the lib package, even though they are > > in > > the servlet package. > > Same here. The one in libdir is a symlink to the other. Tomcat is a > complicated > beast and we are fighting it with symlinks. I understand the rationale behind having symlinks for the configuration files. For instance we have /etc/tomcat/server.xml and /usr/share/tomcat/conf/server.xml. This is so that people who are used to seeing the file in each location can edit it there. But why do we have JULI symbolically linked? JULI is only put on the class path from the init script right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
