Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706984 --- Comment #9 from Jaromír Cápík <[email protected]> 2011-05-30 09:22:31 EDT --- Hi Marek. I somehow haven't noticed You've done the review :] >>Which part of the lib is licensed under BSD? Homepage states only MIT. LICENSE.txt contained in the source tarball is BSD and the project homepage states MIT. I'll try to reach upstream again, but as I got no answer for my first question, I don't suppose I'll be more successful in case of license clarification -> don't know if we should wait for the clarification. >>It seems the instructions to get the source code from SVN are not working for me. Could you please check it? You have to register on java.net and upload Your personal ssh key to the server in order to be able to export the sources. It seems that it would be better to make a note in the spec file stating this fact. >>I don't know :) The download section on homepage gives 404. Any hints? Yes. They don't care about the link anymore. The only way how to obtain the source is via the svn export. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
