Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722707 --- Comment #6 from Randall "Randy" Berry <[email protected]> 2011-07-17 06:24:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Actually, the naming is OK. Now that I do further research shouldn't the name be mingw32-libvorbis so that it matches the naming scheme of the mingw32 packages? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Package_naming Package naming Built packages should be named by prefixing the upstream package name with mingw32- Source packages can be named starting with mingw- in order to more easily support a transition to the new MinGW guidelines which mandate that naming. Otherwise two separate package repositories must be set up ("mingw32-foo" and "mingw-foo") with one needing to be marked EOL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
