Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=724859 Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|[email protected] |[email protected] --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]> 2011-07-24 05:52:36 EDT --- I't almost ok exept what isn't :) I made two patches (and rebased them all as well): http://peter.fedorapeople.org/newlisp/ Patch #2 allows us to pass additional Fedora flags (in fact it overrides default newlisp's ones, so, please examine which additional flags are required for normal operation. For your info - I added them in comments above the line with 'make' invocation. Also I properly claimed ownership on all directories and removed excessive stuff (no need to explicitly claim man-pages as %doc). Please, take a look at this spec-file: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/newlisp/newlisp.spec and make sure that all these commented out gcc flags are not required (or otherwise): # -pedantic -Wno-strict-aliasing -Wno-long-long After you confirm that it does work with the current CFLAGS, I'll continue review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
