Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652623 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]> 2011-07-25 02:43:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #9) > > I don't think that we need an explicit licensing information for > > include/bitcask.hrl as it might be considered as a derivative work from > > files > > in src/ directory (thus inheriting all their legal information). > > Unfortunately > > (or fortunately) IANAL. > > Ping? > > I could accept this file without the license headers, but maybe we could get a > confirmation about the license from the upstream developers first. If the > files > in the doc/ directory still have no licenses, they would need to be dropped > from the package. Still here. I plan to return to the Riak quite soon - in a week or two. I'll rewrite these files and will drop additional content. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
