Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 --- Comment #4 from Martin Gieseking <[email protected]> 2011-07-29 12:45:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Yes, my SPEC file is for xnee. I will package libxnee, cnee and gnee from the > tarball... If you agree. Yes, that would be fine. However, you don't need create a separate spec for that. Just build everything from the spec file of xnee (shared libxnee, cnee, and gnee,...) and put the various files into different subpackages, e.g.: xnee (base package): main applications + corresponding data (image files, etc.) libxnee: shared library files libxnee.so.* libxnee-devel: header files and libxnee.so The static libxnee library should not be built, linked and packaged except there are good reasons for it. Fedora usually provides shared libraries only. You can drop the scriptlets again, because - you only have to update the icon cache if something is installed below /usr/share/icons. - there's no MimeType entry in the .desktop file => no need to run update-desktop-database - the package doesn't install a mimeinfo file => no need to run update-mime-database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
