Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 Jon Ciesla <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla <[email protected]> 2011-08-17 22:10:33 EDT --- Good: - rpmlint checks return: See above, OK. I don't love them, but they make sense. :) - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license ( ) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86) - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - post/postun ldconfig ok FIX and/or comment on: - no .la files - devel requires base package n-v-r PENDING MOCK BUILD: - no missing BR -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
