Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730559 Paul W. Frields <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jaredsmith@jareds | |mith.net) --- Comment #1 from Paul W. Frields <[email protected]> 2011-08-26 16:02:48 EDT --- $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/drupal7-date.spec rpmbuild/SRPMS/drupal7-date-2.0-0.1.alpha3.fc15.src.rpm rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/drupal7-date-2.0-0.1.alpha3.fc15.noarch.rpm drupal7-date.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.0-alpha3 ['2.0-0.1.alpha3.fc15', '2.0-0.1.alpha3'] drupal7-date.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/drupal7-date-2.0/LICENSE.txt drupal7-date.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/share/drupal7/modules/date/help/date-views.html 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. The warning can be fixed by using one of the correct versions. (I prefer the second since you can then reuse the content for other branches more easily.) The first error should be reported upstream, but you can use a current copy of the correct LICENSE file from the FSF, since upstream intent is clear (GPLv2+). The second can be corrected with a 'find | xargs rm -f' -- some existing D6 modules are using this as well. Make sure the existence of the file in question isn't required for the module to run properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
