Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693317 --- Comment #7 from Akira TAGOH <[email protected]> 2011-09-02 01:30:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > xemacs-packages-extra provides apel-xemacs at least. That's true. this is why emacs-apel doesn't provide a subpackage for xemacs to avoid the conflict. anyway, that change has been mode some years ago though. > Since flim is only needed by emacs-w3m, I also asked Tagoh-san > if he is interested in owning emacs-common-flim. I don't mind either. I'm not keen to keep the owner of emacs-w3m either, because I rarely use it these days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
