Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731003

--- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim <[email protected]> 2011-09-08 
05:56:24 EDT ---
Hi Pavel,

Thanks for the review. I've made the changes you requested:

Spec URL: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/lua-moonscript.spec
SRPM URL:
http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/funpl/lua-moonscript-0.1.0-2.fc16.src.rpm

- git checkout instructions added
- git archive command's two lines properly joined with \
- tabs -> spaces
- cp, install etc. no longer using macros (I normally don't use them, myself,
  but I based this spec on another Lua package that does)
- added runtime requirements on the build dependencies

The one change I didn't make is the dependency on lua-inotify: it's not used at
build time, and at runtime it is conditionally used if available (if you want
to watch a directory and automatically recompile changed source files).

Since Fedora does not recommend using RPM's "Recommend" tag, I'll probably turn
this into a runtime requirement once all the packages are reviewed, but there's
probably no point making the packages harder to test right now, as it does not
cause any breakage.

Let me know if there's anything else that need changing. Thanks!

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to