Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652971 --- Comment #35 from Ilyes Gouta <[email protected]> 2011-09-30 16:10:14 EDT --- Hi Michael, > For the versioned libraries that would be better. Not mandatory however > with our current guidelines. Primarly I want you to be aware of this. Yes, indeed. It's important, as similar versioned shared libraries provided by more than one package would cause associated binaries to clash and potentially misbehaving. This is nicely documented over https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath > Even if currently there are no other packages in the package collection, > which share these library names, it is not nice to pollute the global > namespace with versioned SONAME Provides. Do I need to include a: rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/code-editor/lib*.so.1 In my %install section? Thanks, -Ilyes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
