Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739856 --- Comment #15 from Ralf Corsepius <[email protected]> 2011-10-17 05:18:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > There is not much to be changed in this concrete case as it is simple > base/plugins subpackage relationship. I do not say anything about your Perl > case as I do not know it and there it might make sense to do it the other way > very much. There are dozens of similar cases in Fedora ... > And, please, stop ad hominem attacks in the bugzilla comments. I don't see about any ad-hominem attack in my comments. Limitations of the the "base package" approach being present in all RH-based distros are well known, well understood and its origins (RH-tradition) also well understood. "base packages" offen technically suffice at one point in time, but they lack the flexibility and generality to cope with changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
