Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=760357 Steve Traylen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |[email protected] AssignedTo|[email protected] |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen <[email protected]> 2011-12-06 09:58:18 EST --- Hi, You have a type rm -rf %{_buildroot} should of course be rm -rf %{buildroot} Otherwise this looks like a text book rubygem package as described on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby I have issues with the ruby guidelines but they are what they are so we follow them: Checksums match. $ md5sum systemu-2.4.1.gem ../SOURCES/systemu-2.4.1.gem c95eb1dd231cac73b11224a9d3ee35c2 systemu-2.4.1.gem c95eb1dd231cac73b11224a9d3ee35c2 ../SOURCES/systemu-2.4.1.gem License is marked with 'Ruby or GPLv2' and this is clearly correct. same as Ruby's http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/LICENSE.txt is contained within the LICENSE.txt file. rubygem-systemu.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) stdout -> stout, std out, std-out rubygem-systemu.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) stderr -> std err, std-err, stander rubygem-systemu.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) pid -> peed, dip, pud which are all fine. rubygem-systemu.noarch: W: non-standard-group Unspecified rubygem-systemu.src: W: non-standard-group Unspecified rubygem-systemu.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 16 warnings. So please add a group and correct the _buildroot macro and I think it is there. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
