Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=761619 --- Comment #1 from David Woodhouse <[email protected]> 2011-12-19 16:37:41 EST --- binutils-xtensa-linux-gnu.x86_64: W: cross-directory-hard-link /usr/cross/xtensa-linux-gnu/bin/ranlib /usr/bin/xtensa-linux-gnu-ranlib binutils-xtensa-linux-gnu.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/man/man1/xtensa-linux-gnu-c++filt.1.gz cross-c++filt.1.gz binutils-xtensa-linux-gnu.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xtensa-linux-gnu-ld.bfd binutils-xtensa-linux-gnu.x86_64: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr cross You've explained the dangling symlinks, and I think that's OK. If you can arrange a man page for ld, that would be nice but it's not mandatory. We'll have to check what the rules are for non-standard directories in /usr, and the cross-directory hard links. Also: cross-binutils.src:49: W: macro-in-comment %{version} cross-binutils.src:138: W: macro-in-comment %ifarch cross-binutils.src:139: W: macro-in-comment %if cross-binutils.src:139: W: macro-in-comment %{_lib} cross-binutils.src:140: W: macro-in-comment %patch03 cross-binutils.src:141: W: macro-in-comment %endif cross-binutils.src:142: W: macro-in-comment %endif cross-binutils.src:398: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot} cross-binutils.src:398: W: macro-in-comment %{_prefix} cross-binutils.src:399: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot} cross-binutils.src:399: W: macro-in-comment %{_mandir} cross-binutils.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch3: binutils-2.20.51.0.2-ia64-lib64.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
