Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=781687

Orcan Ogetbil <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
         AssignedTo|[email protected]    |[email protected]
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?

--- Comment #1 from Orcan Ogetbil <[email protected]> 2012-01-16 23:23:32 
EST ---
I reviewed this package. It is mostly fine. There are a few minor issues.
Stuff marked with "does no harm" are just my remarks. Those are not strictly
required to be changed.

! Please include the file NEWS in %doc umentation

* rpmlint says:
   lv2-ui-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package
      We should probably disable this via
         %global debug_package %{nil}
   lv2-ui.x86_64: E: no-binary
   lv2-ui.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
   lv2-ui-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/include/lv2/lv2plug.in/ns/extensions/ui ../../../../../lib64/lv2/ui.lv2
   lv2-ui-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
      Ignore the above four
   lv2-ui.x86_64: W: no-documentation
      See above (NEWS file)

- BR: pkgconfig not required. They don't do harm though
- R: pkgconfig not required. No harm either

? Does this
   %{_libdir}/lv2/ui.lv2
need to be
   %dir %{_libdir}/lv2/ui.lv2
The former will include everything inside the directory, but you are also
including the individual files inside the directory later on.

* /usr/include/lv2/lv2plug.in/ns/extensions/
remains unowned. Should lv2core own this or should this package?

! These
   %post -p /sbin/ldconfig
   %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
should probably be removed. We are not placing anything directly in %_libdir
(or in any other ld search path)

- We don't compile anything, thus 
   # Enforce Fedora specific build flags                                        
   sed -i 's|c99|c99 %{optflags}|' wscript
seems irrelevant. Does no harm though.

- rm -rf %{buildroot}
is not required anymore. Does no harm.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

Reply via email to